Short Communication

A survey of animal welfare needs in Soweto : research communication

C.M.E. McCrindle, S.T. Cornelius, H.S. Schoeman
Journal of the South African Veterinary Association | Vol 68, No 4 | a895 | DOI: | © 1997 C.M.E. McCrindle, S.T. Cornelius, H.S. Schoeman | This work is licensed under CC Attribution 4.0
Submitted: 13 July 1997 | Published: 13 July 1997

About the author(s)

C.M.E. McCrindle,
S.T. Cornelius,
H.S. Schoeman,

Full Text:

PDF (158KB)

Share this article

Bookmark and Share


The diagnostic phase of an interactive research evaluation model was used in the investigation of the animal welfare needs of a low-income urban community in South Africa. Data were gathered by means of a structured interview and direct observations by animal welfare officers. During the survey of 871 animal owners in Soweto, it was found that dogs were owned by 778 households and cats by 88 households. The dog to human ratio was estimated at 1:12.4. Respondents were asked whether they enjoyed owning animals and 96.1 % said that they did. Only 26.3 % mentioned that they had problems with their own animals and 16.6 % had problems with other people's animals. Treatment of sick animals (29.7 %) was seen as a priority. However, less than 1 % (n = 6) used the services of private veterinarians. Others took their animals to welfare organisations or did not have them treated. Perceptions of affordable costs of veterinary treatments were also recorded. In addition to treatment, respondents indicated a need for vaccination (22.5 %), sterilisation (16.5 %), control of internal (3.7 %) and external (8.8 %) parasites, education and extension (6.6 %), prevention of cruelty to animals (3.2 %) and expansion of veterinary clinics to other parts of Soweto (1.3 %).


Animal Welfare; Soweto; Survey; Veterinary Needs Appraisal


Total abstract views: 2403
Total article views: 3106


Crossref Citations

1. Spatial-Temporal Accessibility and Inequality of Veterinary Service in Hong Kong: A Geographic Information System-Based Study
Ka Yiu Ng, Chun Long Ho, Keumseok Koh
Frontiers in Veterinary Science  vol: 9  year: 2022  
doi: 10.3389/fvets.2022.857914