Ten lions (Panthera leo) that were treated with a single injection of doramectin at a dose ranging between 0.2 mg/kg and 0.5 mg/kg showed clinical signs
consistent with avermectin toxicity, namely ataxia, hallucinations, and mydriasis. Two subsequently died whereas the other eight lions recovered after 4–5 days with
symptomatic therapy. Post-mortem examinations of the two that died showed cyanosis, severe pulmonary oedema, pleural effusion, and pericardial effusion, with histopathology
not revealing any abnormalities. In both these lions, doramectin brain and liver tissue concentrations were elevated. Although doramectin is regularly used in wild
felids, to date there have been no reports of avermectin toxicity in the literature. This article highlights the potential for doramectin toxicity in this species.
Doramectin is a novel avermectin that is produced by mutational biosynthesis and differs from ivermectin by having a cyclohexyl group in the C25 position of the avermectin
ring (Goudie et al. 1993; Reinemeyer & Courtney 2001). Doramectin has a broad range of activity against endoparasites and ectoparasites, and although only
approved for use in cattle, sheep, goats and swine (Plumb 1999; Reinemeyer & Courtney 2001), off-label use has been widely used and reported in other species
(Yas-Natan et al. 2003). In lions, it is used extra-label, both as an anthelmintic against intestinal round worms and systemic filaroides, as well as an ectoparasitic
against ticks, blow fly strike, mites, and ear mites.Like other macrocyclic lactones, doramectin has two modes of action. The primary mode of action is binding of the doramectin molecule to postsynaptic glutamate-gated
chloride ion channels in the synapses between inhibitory interneurons and excitatory motor neurons in nematodes, and in myoneural junctions in arthropods (Plumb 1999;
Reinemeyer & Courtney 2001). Avermectins also enhance the release of gamma-aminobutyric-acid (GABA) in presynaptic neurons, which, in turn, open postsynaptic GABA-gated
chloride channels (Hopper, Aldrich & Haskins 2002; Plumb 1999; Reinemeyer & Courtney 2001). In either case, the influx of chloride ions reduces cell membrane
resistance, which prevents the potential hyperpolarisation of neural stimuli to muscles, resulting in flaccid paralysis and death (Plumb 1999; Reinemeyer & Courtney
2001). The avermectins are highly toxic to invertebrates and can be toxic to mammals, with clinical signs of toxicity being mydriasis, vomiting, seizure activity, and/or tremors,
coma, and death from respiratory failure (Plumb 1999; Reinemeyer & Courtney 2001). Ivermectin toxicity in collies and other dog breeds has been well documented and has
been associated with diffuse cerebral and cerebellar dysfunction. Signs of toxicosis are related to the penetration of the drug into the central nervous system (CNS)
(Yas-Natan et al. 2003). Doramectin has a plasma half-life of approximately twice that of ivermectin in cattle (Reinemeyer & Courtney 2001). The difference between the two drugs can be explained
by the greater non-polarity of doramectin and its slower metabolism due to the cyclohexyl group (Goudie et al. 1993, Perez et al. 2002; Toutain et al.
1997). Thus, the clinical course of doramectin toxicity would be expected to be longer when compared with ivermectin toxicity. Although regularly used in wild felids as an endo-and ectoparasitic drug , to date there have been no reports of avermectin toxicity in the literature. This article
describes doramectin toxicity in a group of lions.
Ten captive lions (four tawny and six white) were treated with a single injection of doramectin at a dose ranging between 0.2 mg/kg and 0.5 mg/kg, given either
subcutaneously or intramuscularly with a pole syringe, depending on the angle of the pole syringe and accessibility. The animals’ body weights were estimated,
which may have been inaccurate, and they were thus possibly given a much higher dose of doramectin. The lions’ weights were estimated on average age weights, as
sub-adult and young adults generally range in weight between 150 kg and 200 kg. Two days later, all ten animals were fed a horse carcass. The horse had
been treated with doramectin, butylscopolamine, and flunixin meglumine in the neck muscles two days before being shot. Three to 5 days later all ten lions started to show
clinical signs of ataxia, hallucinations, and mydriasis. The lions appeared to be seeing objects that did not exist, as they would follow an imaginary object with their
eyes and paw at it and would also sit and stare into the distance without being aware of their surroundings. It was also noted that the white lions showed more severe
clinical signs, namely severe disorientation, loss of balance, ataxia of all four limbs, and falling over, whereas the tawny lions were less disorientated and ataxic.
Two subsequently died, five days after ingestion of the carcass, both of which were white lions. One was an adult (18 months) and the other a sub-adult (5 months). The
other eight lions recovered after 4–5 days with symptomatic treatment, which included intravenous and subcutaneous fluids, short-acting corticosteroids, broad-spectrum
antibiotics, omeprazole, sucralfate, butaphosphate as an appetite stimulant, and vitamin B1 and A injections. Husbandry management was maintained by keeping them in a warm,
protected environment. Post-mortem examinations of the two lions that died revealed cyanosis, severe pulmonary oedema, pleural effusion, and mild pericardial effusion, with histopathology not
revealing any abnormalities. Brain and liver tissue from both these lions showed elevated doramectin concentrations (Table 1).
TABLE 1:
Brain and tissue doramectin concentrations (mg/kg) in two lions with doramectin toxicity.
|
Ivermectin at a therapeutic dose of 0.2 mg/kg can result in toxicosis in predisposed dogs (Hopper et al. 2002; Tranquilli, Paul & Seward 1989). In contrast,
dosages of 2 mg/kg can be administered to beagles and non ivermectin-sensitive Collies without evidence of drug toxicity (Pulliam et al. 1985). The dose of
doramectin used in this group of lions ranged between 0.2 mg/kg and 0.5 mg/kg, which is what has been used in dogs (Borst & Oude-Elferink 2002). However,
as the lion’s body weights were estimated, this could have been inaccurate, resulting in a higher than recommended dose of doramectin being administered. In addition,
the lions were fed a horse carcass and although speculative, the neck muscles may have been contaminated with doramectin as the horse had been treated with doramectin prior
to death. Other lions from the same camp did not show any clinical signs of doramectin toxicity. As these lions had not been treated with doramectin, it could mean that
either they were not susceptible to doramectin or that they did not ingest any contaminated horsemeat. It was also observed that some lions fed on the neck and others on the
rump.Reported signs of acute ivermectin toxicity in predisposed and overdosed dogs include drooling, mydriasis, bradycardia, hyperthermia, ataxia, apparent blindness, decreased
menace response, muscle tremors and disorientation, which may progress to weakness, recumbency, unresponsiveness, stupor and coma (Hopkins, Marcella & Strecker 1990;
Hopper et al. 2002; Paul & Tranquilli 1989; Reinemeyer & Courtney 2001). Doramectin toxicity has been reported in a Border collie (Yas-Natan et al. 2003). The diagnosis was based on the neurological signs, which were similar to those
previously reported for ivermectin toxicity, namely ataxia, disorientation, head pressing, hypersalivation, and bilateral lack of menace response, with normal cranial
nerves, pupillary size, light response, spinal reflexes, and postural reactions. Similar clinical signs, namely ataxia, hallucinations, and mydriasis were present in these
lions. Unfortunately, neurological examinations were not feasible. As death from respiratory failure has been reported with avermectin toxicity (Paul & Tranquilli 1989;
Plumb 1999; Reinemeyer & Courtney 2001), the two lions that died could have died from respiratory failure, as both showed cyanosis on
post-mortem examination, without any obvious other aetiology. Normal and toxic concentrations of doramectin in the brain and liver of Felidae have to date not been reported; however, concentrations have been reported in cattle. In a
herd of Murray Grey cattle, 8 out of 312 cattle treated with a therapeutic dose of ivermectin showed clinical signs of hypersensitivity, with a mean brain concentration of
0.056 mg/kg in affected animals and 0.004 mg/kg in unaffected cattle (Seaman et al. 1987). Thus the levels of 0.183 mg/kg and 0.083 mg/kg
reported in these two lions would be very toxic. In addition, the clinical signs and relatively insignificant post-mortem findings would also support this conclusion. Mammals, unlike nematodes and arthropods, have GABA-mediated inter-neuronal inhibitors only in the CNS (Hopkins et al. 1990; Hopper et al. 2002; Plumb 1989).
It is believed that the mammalian blood brain barrier (BBB) is impermeable to avermectins and therefore toxicity in mammals ensues at a much higher avermectin concentration
compared with nematodes and arthropods (Hopper et al. 2002). An important component of the BBB is the P-glycoprotein. P-glycoprotein is an ATP-driven efflux
transporter (ABC transporter), encoded by the multidrug-resistance gene MDR1/ABCB1 (Dean, Rzhetsky & Allikmets 2001). It is known that MDR1 P-glycoprotein transports a
wide range of structurally unrelated lipophilic and amphipathic drugs, toxins, and xenobiotics, including many commonly used veterinary drugs (Geyer et al. 2007). The
MDR1 efflux machinery protects the organism from exposure to drugs and environmental xenobiotics by decreasing their absorption in the intestinal tract and promoting their
excretion into bile and urine. Additionally, MDR1 P-glycoprotein in the blood–brain barrier highly restricts the entry of drugs and xenobiotics into the central nervous
system (Borst & Oude Elferink 2002; Fromm 2000). A mutation in the MDRI gene has been described in ivermectin-sensitive collies (Mealey, Bentjen & Waiting 2002). The
product of the MDRI gene, P-glycoprotein, is an important component of the blood-brain barrier, and is a drug transporter expressed in the luminal membrane of brain capillary
endothelial cells (Mealey et al. 2002). Its function in the brain is to transport certain substrates, including ivermectin, from the brain tissue back into the
capillary lumen, thus lowering the concentrations of these drugs in the CNS. The frequency of the homozygous mutant genotype in a population of collies in Washington and
Idaho was 35%, which is similar to the estimated prevalence of ivermectin sensitivity in collies (Mealey et al. 2002). Determination of the MDR1 genotype of the
affected lions was not performed; however, it is reasonable to assume that the affected lions were homozygous for the mutant allele, and that this was more prevalent in
white lions, as they showed more severe clinical signs than the others.
Conclusion and recommendations
|
|
In conclusion, the very high brain and liver concentrations of doramectin in two lions, typical clinical signs, and relatively insignificant post-mortem findings all
support the diagnosis of doramectin toxicity in the lions. Thus, doramectin should be used with care in this species and future studies looking at the presence or absence
of the MDR1 gene in lions are also warranted.
Competing interests
The authors declare that they have no financial or personal relationship(s) which may have inappropriately influenced them in writing this paper.
Authors’ contributions
R.G.L. (Bryanston Veterinary Hospital), consultation on the case, literature search, writing of the article. P.C. (Old Chapel Veterinary Clinic) data collection,
case consultation, writing of the article.
Borst, P. & Oude-Elferink, R., 2002, ‘Mammalian ABC transporters in health and disease’, Annual Review of Biochemistry 71, 537–592.
http://dx.doi.org/10.1146/annurev.biochem.71.102301.093055,
PMid:12045106
Dean, M., Rzhetsky, A. & Allikmets, R., 2001, ‘The human ATP-binding cassette (ABC) transporter superfamily’, Genome Research 11, 1156–1166.
http://dx.doi.org/10.1101/gr.GR-1649R,
PMid:11435397
Fromm, M.F., 2000, ‘P-glycoprotein: A defense mechanism limiting oral bioavailability and CNS accumulation of drugs’, International Journal of Clinical
Pharmacology and Therapeutics 38, 69–74. PMid:10706193 Geyer, J., Klintzsch, S., Meerkamp, K., Wohlke, A., Distl, O., Moritz, A. et al., 2007, ‘Detection of the nt230(del4) MDR1 mutation in White Swiss Shepherd
dogs: Case reports of doramectin toxicosis, breed predisposition, and microsatellite analysis’, Journal of Veterinary Pharmacology and Therapy 30,
482–485. http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2885.2007.00885.x,
PMid:17803743
Goudie, A.C., Evans, N.A., Gration, K.A.F., Bishop, B.F., Gibson, S.P., Holdom, K.S. et al., 1993, ‘Doramectin – A potent novel endectocide’,
Veterinary Parasitology 49, 5–15. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/0304-4017%2893%2990218-C
Hopkins, K.D., Marcella, K.L. & Strecker, A.E., 1990, ‘Ivermectin toxicosis in a dog’, Journal of the American Veterinary Medical Association 197,
93–94. PMid:2370228
Hopper, K., Aldrich, J. & Haskins, S.C., 2002, ‘Ivermectin toxicity in 17 collies’, Journal of Veterinary Internal Medicine 16, 89–94.
http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/j.1939-1676.2002.tb01611.x, PMid:11822811 Mealey, K.L., Bentjen, S.A. & Waiting, D.K., 2002, ‘Frequency of the mutant MDR1 allele associated with ivermectin sensitivity in a sample population of
Collies from the northwestern United States’, American Journal of Veterinary Research 63, 479–481.
http://dx.doi.org/10.2460/ajvr.2002.63.479, PMid:11939306
Paul, A. & Tranquilli, W., 1989, ‘Ivermectin’, in R.W. Kirk & J.D. Bonagura (eds.), Current veterinary therapy X: Small animal practice,
pp. 140–142, WB Saunders, Philadelphia. Perez, R., Cabezas, I., Godoy, C., Rubilar, L., Munoz, L., Arboix, M. et al., 2002, ‘Pharmacokinetics of doramectin and ivermectin after oral administration
in horses’, Veterinary Journal 163, 161–167.
http://dx.doi.org/10.1053/tvjl.2001.0624 Plumb, D.C., 1999, Veterinary drug handbook, 3rd edn., Iowa State University Press, Ames. Pulliam, J.D., Seward, R.L., Henry, R.T. & Steinberg, S.A., 1985, ‘Investigating ivermectin toxicity in Collies’, Veterinary Medicine 80,
33–40. Reinemeyer, C.R. & Courtney, C.H., 2001, ‘Antinematodal drugs’, in H.R. Adams (ed.), Veterinary pharmacology and therapeutics, 8th edn., pp.
963–969, Iowa State University Press, Ames. Seaman, J.T., Eagleson, J.S., Carrigan, M.J. & Webb, R.F., 1987, ‘Avermectin B1 toxicity in a herd of Murray Grey cattle’, Australian
Veterinary Journal 64, 284–285. http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/j.1751-0813.1987.tb15963.x,
PMid:3426470 Toutain, P.L., Upson, D.W., Terhune, T.N. & Mckenzie, M.E., 1997, ‘Comparative pharmacokinetics of doramectin and ivermectin in cattle’, Veterinary
Parasitology 72, 3–8.
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/S0304-4017%2897%2900070-8
Tranquilli, W.J., Paul, A.J. & Seward, R.L., 1989, ‘Ivermectin plasma concentrations in collies sensitive to ivermectin-induced toxicosis’,
American Journal of Veterinary Research 50, 769–770.
PMid:2729723
Yas-Natan, E., Shamir, M., Kleinbart, S. & Aroch, I., 2003, ‘Doramectin toxicity in a collie’, Veterinary Record 153, 718–720.
PMid:14690080
|