About the Author(s)


Christo J. Botha Email symbol
Department of Paraclinical Sciences, University of Pretoria, South Africa

Elizabeth C. du Plessis symbol
VETPATH, Division of IDEXX Laboratories, South Africa

Heleen Coetser
Toxicology and Ethnoveterinary Medicine, Agricultural Research Council-Onderstepoort Veterinary Institute, South Africa

Magda Rosemann
National Horseracing Authority of Southern Africa, Kenilworth, South Africa

Citation


Botha, C.J., Du Plessis, E.C., Coetser, H. & Rosemann, M., 2018, ‘Analytical confirmation of imidacloprid poisoning in granivorous Cape spurfowl (Pternistis capensis)’, Journal of the South African Veterinary Association 89(0), a1637. https://doi.org/10.4102/jsava.v89i0.1637

Case Report

Analytical confirmation of imidacloprid poisoning in granivorous Cape spurfowl (Pternistis capensis)

Christo J. Botha, Elizabeth C. du Plessis, Heleen Coetser, Magda Rosemann

Received: 17 Nov. 2017; Accepted: 15 May 2018; Published: 09 July 2018

Copyright: © 2018. The Author(s). Licensee: AOSIS.
This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.

Abstract

Reports were received that Cape spurfowl (Pternistis capensis) fell during flight and scrambled uncoordinatedly for cover and some died. Three carcases were submitted for necropsy examination, which revealed mainly congestion of the carcases and haemorrhages. Common causes of acute mortalities in birds were first excluded, but there was a history of possible exposure to imidacloprid-treated barley seeds. Imidacloprid, a neonicotinoid insecticide, is used to protect various crops against invertebrate pests. The combined crop contents and pooled liver samples collected from the Cape spurfowl during necropsy were submitted for liquid chromatography–high-resolution mass spectrometry (LC-HRMS) for imidacloprid analysis. Imidacloprid and several of its metabolites were detected in the samples. Farmers should cover sown seeds with a layer of soil and remove any spilled seeds, as granivorous birds are susceptible to imidacloprid intoxication. Regulatory authorities should re-evaluate the risk posed by imidacloprid-treated seeds for pollinators and granivorous birds.

Introduction

Imidacloprid, a neonicotinoid insecticide, is used in veterinary medicine as a topical ectoparasiticide (mainly for flea control) and also as an agricultural pesticide for the control of invertebrate pests affecting crop production and ornamental flowers (Tomizawa & Casida 2005; Van Zyl 2013). Various formulations are retailed, and it is commonly used as a seed treatment (Gibbons, Morrissey & Mineau 2015). Imidacloprid acts as an agonist at nicotinic cholinergic receptors in the peripheral and central nervous system (Tomizawa & Casida 2005). The oral LD50 of imidacloprid in rats is 450 mg/kg, but birds are more sensitive (Tomizawa & Casida 2005). The acute oral LD50 for grey partridge (Perdix perdix) is 13.9 mg/kg and 31 mg/kg for Japanese quail (Coturnix japonica) (Gibbons et al. 2015; Tomizawa & Casida 2005). Balani, Agrawal and Thaker (2011) referred to an ‘apparent’ LD50 of 50 mg/kg in chickens.

Initially, it was reported that imidacloprid has a repellent effect that will deter granivorous birds from ingesting treated seeds (Avery, Decker & Fisher 1994). However, recently there have been several reports of wild birds being adversely affected. Millot et al. (2017) provided evidence of mortality events attributed to the ingestion of imidacloprid-treated seeds by wild birds, mainly pigeons (Columba species) and grey partridges, in France.

Case history

During May 2017, reports were received of Cape spurfowl (Pternistis capensis) ‘acting strangely’ on open crop fields near the Overberg Renosterveld Conservancy, Greyton, Western Cape Province, South Africa. The birds would attempt to fly and then somersaulted or tumbled out of the air, dropping to the ground, crash landing and bouncing out of control. After a few seconds, they would attempt to hide, but were clearly struggling to move. Instead of flying, the birds scrambled away and hurriedly dashed for cover. The farmers from the area indicated that not only Cape spurfowl but Greywing francolin (Francolinus africanus) was affected too. The fields were recently sown with wheat or barley and seeds were visible on the ground. One of the farmers indicated that imidacloprid (Ronsek 600 FS, Villa Crop Protection [Pty], Ltd.) was used as a systemic insecticide seed treatment before sowing. An intoxication was suspected and three carcases of Cape spurfowl were later submitted for necropsy examination.

Preliminary investigations

Macroscopically the following were noted: moderate haemorrhages present in the coelomic cavity and in the air sacs; moderate, diffuse congestion of the carcases; moderate congestion of the livers; severely enlarged and congested spleens; severe to mild pulmonary congestion and haemorrhage; and the kidneys were mildly to moderately congested. The crops of the birds were filled with blueish-stained barley seeds (Figure 1). The major gross lesions observed were indicative of acute mortality.

FIGURE 1: Crop contents with bluish discoloured barley seeds visible.

Primary causes of neurological signs and acute mortality in birds were ruled out first. Pooled organ samples from the birds were submitted to exclude avian influenza and Newcastle disease viruses using polymerase chain reaction (PCR) techniques. Neither Newcastle disease nor avian influenza viral infections could be detected in these birds.

Crop contents were collected for routine toxicological analysis. The combined crop contents of the birds were extracted following an approved standard operating procedure. Briefly, 20 g of combined crop contents were extracted with 100 mL of ethyl acetate on a mechanical shaker (Labcon) for 1 hour and analysed using gas chromatography–mass spectrometry (GC-MS, Varian 3900, Saturn 2100T). No common pesticide for which routine analysis was performed (i.e. organophosphorus, carbamate and organochlorine compounds or phosphine gas) was identified in the crop contents.

Analysis of samples for imidacloprid

As there was a history of possible exposure to imidacloprid, the extracted and evaporated crop content sample (as prepared and used for pesticide analysis) and a pooled liver sample were submitted for further chemical analysis.

The samples were analysed with liquid chromatography–high-resolution mass spectrometry (LC-HRMS) to determine the presence of imidacloprid.

A standard containing 1 mg/mL imidacloprid (Sigma-Aldrich Chemie, Germany) was dissolved in acetonitrile (Burdick & Jackson, USA) and used to prepare a calibration curve in methanol at 0 ng/mL, 50 ng/mL, 100 ng/mL, 250 ng/mL, 500 ng/mL, 1000 ng/mL, 2000 ng/mL, 5000 ng/mL and 10 000 ng/mL. The calibrators were injected into the LC-HRMS. Chicken liver was used to prepare blank liver and spiked liver (50 ng/g) quality control (QC) samples.

The extracted crop sample container was rinsed with acetonitrile and centrifuged, and the clear layer was decanted and then evaporated. The sample was reconstituted in 200 μL methanol and injected into the LC-HRMS instrument. The sample was further diluted to fall within the calibration range.

The pooled liver sample was chopped, and duplicate 5 g portions were weighed for analysis. The liver samples were homogenised (IKA Ultraturrex homogeniser, Zymark Turbovap) with 10 mL acetonitrile and centrifuged at 3000 g for 15 min, and the clear layers were evaporated and reconstituted in 1 mL methanol. The extracts were injected into the LC-HRMS instrument.

The same LC-HRMS conditions described in previous toxicology investigations by Botha et al. (2014) and Singo et al. (2017) were used. Full mass spectrometry (MS) experiments were used to record the initial qualitative and quantitative results. Qualitative data were processed with ToxID, and Xcalibur Quanbrowser software (Thermo Fisher, USA) was used to quantify the results. Full mass spectrometry to data-dependent mass spectrometry (FullMS > ddMS2) experiments were used to obtain spectra of the metabolite peaks and were matched, where possible, with library entries for confirmation of the identities.

Results of the analysis

Imidacloprid was detected in all the samples analysed by LC-HRMS. In this study, 14 314 ng imidacloprid was determined in 20 g of pooled and extracted crop contents of three Cape spurfowl, equating to a concentration of 7.16 μg/g. The imidacloprid concentration detected in the crop contents was comparable to previous studies (Table 1). On the contrary, the liver contained very low concentrations of imidacloprid. The pooled liver concentrations of the three Cape spurfowl, analysed in duplicate, were 16 ng/g and 29 ng/g wet weight.

TABLE 1: Imidacloprid concentrations (μg/g wet weight) in crop contents and liver samples collected from poisoned birds.

Discussion

The neurological signs observed during this outbreak were similar to those reported by Millot et al. (2017). They described a sudden fall during flight, ataxia, paresis, paralysis and behavioural changes. In the current case, haemorrhage was present in two of the three birds within the coelomic cavity and is probably of traumatic origin considering the history that these birds fell from the sky. Congestion and haemorrhages in several organs were also reported by Millot et al. (2017). During this outbreak, the mortalities only occurred over a short period, which is in agreement with the transient effect previously observed (Millot et al. 2017).

Berny et al. (1999) and Millot et al. (2017) employed a high-performance thin layer chromatography (HPTLC) technique, and Lopez-Antia et al. (2015) measured imidacloprid concentrations by liquid chromatography–mass spectrometry (LC-MS). Detection with LC-HRMS is very sensitive, as indicated by the low concentrations that were measured (limit of quantitation [LOQ] = 10 ng/g) in this study. Because of the acuteness of mortality, Millot et al. (2017) surmised that imidacloprid might only be detectable in the crop or gizzard and not in the liver. Therefore, analysis using this highly sensitive LC-HRMS technique is advisable. Recovery of imidacloprid from the blank liver matrix at 50 ng/g was slightly higher at 130%.

Berny et al. (1999) and Millot et al. (2017) reported median imidacloprid concentrations of 11.4 μg/g and μg/g 16.3 and 15.0 μg/g and 34.7 μg/g in crop samples from grey partridge and pigeons, respectively. Lopez-Antia et al. (2015) determined mean concentrations of 4.1 μg/g – 55.3 μg/g in the crop contents of red-legged partridges (Alectoris rufa) that died during an experiment where they ingested imidacloprid-treated wheat seeds, at a lower (8.8 mg/kg/d) and higher (44 mg/kg/d) dosage rate.

The concentration of imidacloprid measured in this study was slightly lower than the mean liver imidacloprid concentrations of 56.0 ng/g – 82.6 ng/g wet weight reported by Lopez-Antia et al. (2015). Conversely, Berny et al. (1999) and Millot et al. (2017) reported much higher median liver concentrations of 1.2 μg/g and 1.7 μg/g and 1.4 μg/g and 3 μg/g wet weight, respectively, in grey partridge and pigeons found dead and suspected of being poisoned in France. The lower imidacloprid concentrations detected in this study could be ascribed to the longer interval from first sightings of neurobehavioural symptoms to when birds were eventually collected for necropsy examination or could imply that Cape spurfowl is more susceptible. Susceptibility to imidacloprid intoxication varies amongst different seed-eating bird species (Berny et al. 1999; Millot et al. 2017). This can be ascribed to the inherent seed-handling behaviour of granivorous birds, where some species swallow the seed whole and others discard the seed hulls (Avery, Fischer & Primus 1997). Two opinions expressed on factors that reduce the risk of imidacloprid ingestion by granivorous birds are the covering and burying of imidacloprid-treated seeds with soil after sowing or planting and natural aversion (Avery et al. 1994; Millot et al. 2017). However, these are not completely preventative, and treated seeds still pose a significant risk to granivorous birds (Millot et al. 2017) and in particular to Cape spurfowl as they scratch out planted seeds, which may increase their exposure. Spilled seeds or the failure to cover the seeds with soil could have contributed to this incident. Farmers should comply with the instructions and heed the warnings provided on labels and package inserts of commercially available products.

High-resolution mass spectrometry (HRMS) data can retrospectively be investigated for possible metabolites or degradation products based on accurate mass (5 ppm), matching isotope patterns with theoretical values or matching spectra with MS2 libraries. This can give some insight into metabolites where standard reference materials are not available, as indicated in Table 2. Some of the primary metabolites recognised in mammals are 4- and 5-hydroxyimidacloprid, 6-chloronicotinic acid, olefin, guanidine and urea derivatives (Wang et al. 2018). The Food and Agricultural Organization of the United Nations (FAO) (undated) lists 40 possible metabolites of imidacloprid. These compounds were included in the processing method and the results are listed in Table 2. The peak areas of the metabolites observed in the crop and liver samples are also provided in Table 2. Although peak area is not directly linked to concentration, it still provides a means to compare the metabolism of imidacloprid in the crop and liver. The crop sample contained mainly imidacloprid, which was ten times higher than any of the other peaks. The main metabolites detected in the crop sample were imidacloprid–nitrosimine, hydroxyimidacloprid, imidacloprid–urea and imidacloprid–denitro. The metabolites in the crop sample are the same as those found in the degradation pathway in soil (FAO, undated) and is possibly because of soil degradation rather than metabolism in the crop. Compared to the metabolism of imidacloprid in laying hens (FAO), hydroxylated, denitro and urea metabolites were also present in the Cape spurfowl samples. 6-Chloronicotinic acid, a major metabolite in mammals (Tomlin 2009), could not be detected in the liver, which is in agreement with observations reported by Berny et al. (1999), who could also only detect trace amounts. The imidacloprid–denitro–olefin metabolite (not reported in the laying hens) appears to be a major metabolite in the liver compared to the soil sample.

TABLE 2: Imidacloprid and its metabolites detected by liquid chromatography–high-resolution mass spectrometry in the crop contents and liver samples collected from Cape spurfowl that died in the Western Cape.

Some of the neonicotinoid toxic effects can be attributed to the induction of oxidative stress and the generation of reactive oxygen species (ROS) and reactive nitrogen species (RNS) (Lopez-Antia et al. 2015; Wang et al. 2018). In addition, exposure to lower concentrations of imidacloprid in birds can lead to sub-lethal effects such as decreased reproduction and impairment of the pituitary–thyroid axis (Lopez-Antia et al. 2015; Pandey & Mohanty 2015). Furthermore, it has been recorded that in the Netherlands even insectivorous bird populations are decreasing in areas with higher neonicotinoid concentrations in the surface water, but this is ascribed to a decrease in insect populations (Hallmann et al. 2014).

On 01 December 2013, the European Union placed a prohibition (EU Regulation 485/2013) on the marketing of imidacloprid as a seed treatment, albeit because of the deleterious effect on pollinators such as bees (Cresswell 2011; Lopez-Antia et al. 2015). However, regulatory authorities of countries in sub-Saharan Africa where imidacloprid is registered as a seed treatment should take note of the moratorium issued by the European Union and re-assess the risk to pollinators and vertebrates in Africa.

Acknowledgements

The authors would like to thank Dr Odette Curtis, Director, Overberg Renosterveld Conservation Trust, for bringing this outbreak to our attention and for submitting the carcases of the Cape spurfowl.

Competing interests

The authors declare that they have no financial or personal relationships which may have inappropriately influenced them in writing this article.

Authors’ contributions

C.J.B. was the principal investigator, E.C.d.P. performed the necropsies, H.C. performed the pesticide analysis and M.R. performed the LC-HRMS analysis.

References

Avery, M.L., Decker, D.G. & Fischer, D.L., 1994, ‘Cage and flight pen evaluation of avian repellency and hazard associated with imidacloprid-treated rice seed’, Crop Protection 13, 535–540.

Avery, M.L., Fischer, D.L. & Primus, T.M., 1997, ‘Assessing the hazard to granivorous birds feeding on chemically treated seeds’, Pesticide Science 49, 362–366.

Balani, T., Agrawal, S. & Thaker, A.M., 2011, ‘Hematological and biochemical changes due to short-term oral administration of imidacloprid’, Toxicology International 18, 2–4.

Berny, P.J., Buronfosse, F., Videmann, B. & Buronfosse T., 1999, ‘Evaluation of the toxicity of imidacloprid in wild birds. A new high performance thin layer chromatography (HPTLC) method for the analysis of liver and crop samples in suspected poisoning cases’, Journal of Liquid Chromatography and Related Technologies 22, 1547–1559. https://dx.doi.org/10.1081/JLC-100101750

Botha, C.J., Lessing, D., Rösemann, M., Van Wilpe, E. & Williams, J.H., 2014, ‘Analytical confirmation of Xanthium strumarium poisoning in cattle’, Journal of Veterinary Diagnostic Investigation 26, 640–645, viewed 02 November 2017, from http://journals.sagepub.com/doi/pdf/10.1177/1040638714542867

Cresswell, J.E., 2011, ‘A meta-analysis of experiments testing the effects of a neonicotinoid insecticide (imidacloprid) on honey bees’, Ecotoxicology 20, 149–157. https://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s10646-010-0566-0

EU, 2013, Commission Implementing Regulation (EU) No 485/2013 of 24 May 2013, Official Journal of the European Union, viewed from https://publications.europa.eu/en/publication-detail/-/publication/59414fc6-c51a-11e2-ab01-01aa75ed71a1

Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations (FAO), undated, Imidacloprid (206), viewed 14 November 2017, from http://www.fao.org/fileadmin/templates/agphome/documents/Pests_Pesticides/JMPR/Evaluation02/IMIDA_EVjjb.pdf

Gibbons, D., Morrissey, C. & Mineau, P., 2015, ‘A review of the direct and indirect effects of neonicotinoids and fipronil on vertebrate wildlife’, Environmental Science Pollution Research 22, 103–118. https://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s11356-014-3180-5

Hallmann, C.A., Foppen, R.P.B., van Turnhout, C.A.M., de Kroon, H. & Jongejans, E., 2014, ‘Declines in insectivorous birds are associated with high neonicotinoid concentrations’, Nature 551, 341–343. https://dx.doi.org/10.1038/nature13531

Lopez-Antia, A., Ortiz-Santaliestra, M.E., Mougeot, F. & Mateo, R., 2015, ‘Imidacloprid-treated seed ingestion has lethal effect on adult partridges and reduces both breeding investment and offspring immunity’, Environmental Research 136, 97–107. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.envres.2014.10.023

Millot, F., Decors, A., Mastain, O., Quintaine, T., Berny, P., Vey, D. et al., 2017, ‘Field evidence of bird poisonings by imidacloprid-treated seeds: A review of incidents reported by the French SAGIR network from 1995 to 2014’, Environmental Science and Pollution Research 24, 5469–5485. https://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s11356-016-8272-y

Pandey, S.P. & Mohanty, B., 2015, ‘The neonicotinoid pesticide imidacloprid and the dithiocarbamate fungicide mancozeb disrupt the pituitary–thyroid axis of a wildlife bird’, Chemosphere 122, 227–234. https://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.chemosphere.2014.11.061

Singo, A., Myburgh, J.G., Laver, P.N., Venter, E.A., Ferreira, G.C.H., Rösemann, G.M. et al., 2017, ‘Vertical transmission of microcystins to Nile crocodile (Crocodylus niloticus) eggs’, Toxicon 134, 50–56. https://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.toxicon.2017.05.017

Tomizawa, M. & Casida, J.E., 2005, ‘Neonicotinoid insecticide toxicology: Mechanisms of selective action’, Annual Review of Pharmacology and Toxicology 45, 247–268. https://dx.doi.org/10.1146/annurev.pharmtox.45.120403.095930

Tomlin, C.D.S., 2009, The pesticide manual, 15th edn., British Crop Production Council, Hampshire.

Van Zyl, K., 2013, A guide to crop pest management in SA – A compendium of acaricides, insecticides, nematicides, molluscicides, avicides and rodenticides, AVCASA, Pretoria.

Wang, X., Anadón, A., Qinghua, W., Qiao, F., Ares, I., Martínez-Larrañaga, M-R. et al., 2018, ‘Mechanism of neonicotinoid toxicity: Impact on oxidative stress and metabolism’, Annual Review of Pharmacology and Toxicology 58, 18.1–18. https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev-pharmtox-010617-052429


 

Crossref Citations

1. Salmonella enterica serovar Typhimurium bacteraemia in a puppy with canine parvoviral enteritis
Josef Hanekom, Paolo Pazzi, Yolandi Rautenbach, Alischa Henning
Veterinary Record Case Reports  vol: 8  issue: 3  year: 2020  
doi: 10.1136/vetreccr-2020-001171

2. Sublethal agrochemical residues in South African birds, 1969–2024
Lorinda A Hart, Linda van den Heever, Jan-Dieter Ludwigs
Ostrich  vol: 96  issue: 4  first page: 203  year: 2025  
doi: 10.2989/00306525.2025.2573117

3. A neonicotinoid insecticide reduces fueling and delays migration in songbirds
Margaret L. Eng, Bridget J. M. Stutchbury, Christy A. Morrissey
Science  vol: 365  issue: 6458  first page: 1177  year: 2019  
doi: 10.1126/science.aaw9419

4. Evaluation of neurobehavioral abnormalities and immunotoxicity in response to oral imidacloprid exposure in domestic chickens (Gallus gallus domesticus)
Dana Franzen-Klein, Mark Jankowski, Charlotte L. Roy, Hoa Nguyen-Phuc, Da Chen, Lorin Neuman-Lee, Patrick Redig, Julia Ponder
Journal of Toxicology and Environmental Health, Part A  vol: 83  issue: 2  first page: 45  year: 2020  
doi: 10.1080/15287394.2020.1723154

5. High population prevalence of neonicotinoids in sharp-tailed grouse and greater prairie-chickens across an agricultural gradient during spring and fall
Charlotte L. Roy, Da Chen
Science of The Total Environment  vol: 856  first page: 159120  year: 2023  
doi: 10.1016/j.scitotenv.2022.159120

6. Toxicokinetics of Imidacloprid-Coated Wheat Seeds in Japanese Quail (Coturnix japonica) and an Evaluation of Hazard
Thomas G. Bean, Michael S. Gross, Natalie K. Karouna-Renier, Paula F.P. Henry, Sandra L. Schultz, Michelle L. Hladik, Kathryn M. Kuivila, Barnett A. Rattner
Environmental Science & Technology  vol: 53  issue: 7  first page: 3888  year: 2019  
doi: 10.1021/acs.est.8b07062

7. Experimental evidence for clothianidin deposition in feathers of house sparrows after ingestion of sublethal doses treated seeds.
S. Humann-Guilleminot, L. Andreo, E. Blatti, G. Glauser, F. Helfenstein, J. Desprat
Chemosphere  vol: 315  first page: 137724  year: 2023  
doi: 10.1016/j.chemosphere.2022.137724

8. Tissue distribution and sublethal effects of imidacloprid in the South American grayish baywing (Agelaioides badius)
María Belén Poliserpi, Diego Cristos, Juan Manuel Pérez-Iglesias, Julie Céline Brodeur
Chemosphere  vol: 284  first page: 131327  year: 2021  
doi: 10.1016/j.chemosphere.2021.131327

9. Comparative Sublethal Toxicity of Three Neonicotinoids in Red-Winged Blackbirds
Margaret L. Eng, Christy A. Morrissey
Environmental Science & Technology  vol: 59  issue: 28  first page: 14268  year: 2025  
doi: 10.1021/acs.est.5c03152

10. Characterizing imidacloprid and metabolites in songbird blood with applications for diagnosing field exposures
Margaret L. Eng, Chunyan Hao, Christena Watts, Fengrong Sun, Christy A. Morrissey
Science of The Total Environment  vol: 760  first page: 143409  year: 2021  
doi: 10.1016/j.scitotenv.2020.143409

11. Avoidance of neonicotinoid-treated seeds and cotyledons by captive eared doves (Zenaida auriculata, Columbidae)
Laura Addy-Orduna, Jimena Cazenave, Rafael Mateo
Environmental Pollution  vol: 304  first page: 119237  year: 2022  
doi: 10.1016/j.envpol.2022.119237

12. Warning on nine pollutants and their effects on avian communities
Freddie-Jeanne Richard, India Southern, Mari Gigauri, Ginevra Bellini, Oscar Rojas, Anne Runde
Global Ecology and Conservation  vol: 32  first page: e01898  year: 2021  
doi: 10.1016/j.gecco.2021.e01898

13. Wildlife consumption of neonicotinoid-treated seeds at simulated seed spills
Charlotte L. Roy, Pamela L. Coy
Environmental Research  vol: 190  first page: 109830  year: 2020  
doi: 10.1016/j.envres.2020.109830

14. Field Availability and Avoidance of Imidacloprid-Treated Soybean Seeds and Cotyledons by Birds
Laura Addy-Orduna, Rafael Mateo
Environmental Toxicology and Chemistry  vol: 42  issue: 5  first page: 1049  year: 2023  
doi: 10.1002/etc.5597

15. Behavioral and physiological response of the passerine bird Agelaioides badius to seeds coated with imidacloprid
Maria Belen Poliserpi, Tatiana Noya Abad, Eduardo De Gerónimo, Virginia Aparicio, Julie Celine Brodeur
Environmental Science and Pollution Research  vol: 30  issue: 33  first page: 80293  year: 2023  
doi: 10.1007/s11356-023-28074-y

16. Effects of imidacloprid on the survival and biomarker responses of Eristalis tenax larvae (Diptera: Syrphidae): a comparative study between indoor and outdoor exposures
Michel Mathurin Kamdem, Sipho Sithole, Patricks Voua Otomo
Journal of Environmental Science and Health, Part B  vol: 59  issue: 6  first page: 333  year: 2024  
doi: 10.1080/03601234.2024.2343598

17. Repellency, Anorexia and Aversion by Neonicotinoid-Treated Seeds and Cotyledons on Captive Eared Doves
Laura Addy-Orduna, Jimena Cazenave, Rafael Mateo
SSRN Electronic Journal   year: 2021  
doi: 10.2139/ssrn.3933597

18. Imidacloprid Poisoning of Songbirds Following a Drench Application of Trees in a Residential Neighborhood in California, USA
Krysta H. Rogers, Stella McMillin, Katie J. Olstad, Robert H. Poppenga
Environmental Toxicology and Chemistry  vol: 38  issue: 8  first page: 1724  year: 2019  
doi: 10.1002/etc.4473

19. Neonicotinoid insecticides in the environment: A critical review of their distribution, transport, fate, and toxic effects
Mohammed Alsafran, Muhammad Rizwan, Kamal Usman, Muhammad Hamzah Saleem, Hareb Al Jabri
Journal of Environmental Chemical Engineering  vol: 10  issue: 5  first page: 108485  year: 2022  
doi: 10.1016/j.jece.2022.108485

20. Sublethal and Lethal Methods to Detect Recent Imidacloprid Exposure in Birds with Application to Field Studies
Charlotte L. Roy, Mark D. Jankowski, Julia Ponder, Da Chen
Environmental Toxicology and Chemistry  vol: 39  issue: 7  first page: 1355  year: 2020  
doi: 10.1002/etc.4721

21. Persistence of pesticide residues in weathered avian droppings
Nimish B. Vyas, Paula F.P. Henry, Łukasz J. Binkowski, Michelle L. Hladik, Michael S. Gross, Michael A. Schroeder, Dawn M. Davis
Environmental Research  vol: 259  first page: 119475  year: 2024  
doi: 10.1016/j.envres.2024.119475

22. Imidacloprid seed coating poses a risk of acute toxicity to small farmland birds: A weight-of-evidence analysis using data from the grayish baywing Agelaioides badius
María Belén Poliserpi, Diego Sebastián Cristos, Julie Céline Brodeur
Science of The Total Environment  vol: 763  first page: 142957  year: 2021  
doi: 10.1016/j.scitotenv.2020.142957

23. Cytotoxicity, morphological and ultrastructural effects induced by the neonicotinoid pesticide, imidacloprid, using a rat Leydig cell line (LC-540)
MIA Ibrahim, GCH Ferreira, EA Venter, CJ Botha
Environmental Toxicology and Pharmacology  vol: 104  first page: 104310  year: 2023  
doi: 10.1016/j.etap.2023.104310