Original Research
Serological survey of Brucella canis in dogs in urban Harare and selected rural communities in Zimbabwe
Journal of the South African Veterinary Association | Vol 85, No 1 | a1087 |
DOI: https://doi.org/10.4102/jsava.v85i1.1087
| © 2014 Simbarashe Chinyoka, Solomon Dhliwayo, Lisa Marabini, Keith Dutlow, Gift Matope, Davies M. Pfukenyi
| This work is licensed under CC Attribution 4.0
Submitted: 18 July 2013 | Published: 07 April 2014
Submitted: 18 July 2013 | Published: 07 April 2014
About the author(s)
Simbarashe Chinyoka, Department of Clinical Veterinary Studies, Faculty of Veterinary Science, University of Zimbabwe, ZimbabweSolomon Dhliwayo, Department of Clinical Veterinary Studies, Faculty of Veterinary Science, University of Zimbabwe, Zimbabwe
Lisa Marabini, AWARE Trust Zimbabwe, Harare, Zimbabwe
Keith Dutlow, AWARE Trust Zimbabwe, Harare, Zimbabwe
Gift Matope, Department of Paraclinical Veterinary Studies, Faculty of Veterinary Science, University of Zimbabwe, Zimbabwe
Davies M. Pfukenyi, Department of Clinical Veterinary Studies, Faculty of Veterinary Science, University of Zimbabwe, Zimbabwe
Abstract
A cross-sectional study was conducted in order to detect antibodies for Brucella canis (B. canis) in dogs from urban Harare and five selected rural communities in Zimbabwe. Sera from randomly selected dogs were tested for antibodies to B. canis using an enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay. Overall, 17.6% of sera samples tested (57/324, 95% CI: 13.5–21.7) were positive for B. canis antibodies. For rural dogs, seroprevalence varied from 11.7% – 37.9%. Rural dogs recorded a higher seroprevalence (20.7%, 95% CI: 15.0–26.4) compared with Harare urban dogs (12.7%, 95% CI: 6.9–18.5) but the difference was not significant (p = 0.07). Female dogs from both sectors had a higher seroprevalence compared with males, but the differences were not significant (p > 0.05). Five and two of the positive rural dogs had titres of 1:800 and 1:1600, respectively, whilst none of the positive urban dogs had a titre above 1:400. This study showed that brucellosis was present and could be considered a risk to dogs from the studied areas. Further studies are recommended in order to give insight into the epidemiology of brucellosis in dogs and its possible zoonotic consequences in Zimbabwe. Screening for other Brucella spp. (Brucella abortus, Brucella melitensis and Brucella suis) other than B. canis is also recommended.
Keywords
Antibodies; Brucella canis: Dogs; Harare; rural communities; Zimbabwe
Metrics
Total abstract views: 3528Total article views: 10159
Crossref Citations
1. Brucella spp. detection in blood, semen and vaginal swabs in dogs from the urban area of Cuiabá/MT, Brazil
Sara Maria Dantas da Nóbrega Dias, Thalita Priscila Peres Seabra da Cruz, Antônio Henrique Kuczmarski, Luciano Nakazato, Valeria Dutra, Regina Célia Rodrigues da Paz
Ciência Rural vol: 53 issue: 12 year: 2023
doi: 10.1590/0103-8478cr20220455