Original Research

The effect of premedication on the induction dose of propofol in dogs and cats

Judith K. Geel
Journal of the South African Veterinary Association | Vol 62, No 3 | a2076 | DOI: https://doi.org/10.4102/jsava.v62i3.2076 | © 2020 Judith K. Geel | This work is licensed under CC Attribution 4.0
Submitted: 24 April 2020 | Published: 30 September 1991

About the author(s)

Judith K. Geel, Department of Experimental and Clinical Pharmacology, University of the Witwatersrand Medical School, South Africa

Full Text:

PDF (439KB)

Abstract

The effect of premedication on the induction dose of propofol was determined in 15 cats and 25 dogs undergoing elective surgical procedures. The induction dose of propofol in dogs younger than 8 years old was 6,9 ± 0,9 mg kg-¹ (n=4) without premedication and 4,3 ± 1,4 mg kg-¹ (n=12) with premedication with acetylpromazine maleate. The induction dose in cats younger, than 3 years old was 7,8 ± 1,1 mg kg-¹ (n=8) with atropine alone and 7,1 ± 0,9 mg kg (n=7) with the inclusion of acetylpromazine maleate. The reduction in the induction dose of propofol was statistically significant in dogs, hut not in cats. When atropine was used together with a fentanyl-droperidol combination or pethidine and acetylpromazine maleate in dogs, the mean induction dose of propofol was reduced to 2,1 ± 0,1 mg kg (n=4) and 2,4 ± 0,3 mg kg-¹ (n=5), respectively. Propofol was also evaluated as an induction agent in patients undergoing non-elective surgical procedures.

Keywords

Propofol; dogs; cats; premedication; dose; induction; anaesthesia

Metrics

Total abstract views: 1093
Total article views: 422

 

Crossref Citations

1. A comparison of the effects of two different doses of ketamine used for co-induction of anaesthesia with a target-controlled infusion of propofol in dogs
Alastair R Mair, Patricia Pawson, Emily Courcier, Derek Flaherty
Veterinary Anaesthesia and Analgesia  vol: 36  issue: 6  first page: 532  year: 2009  
doi: 10.1111/j.1467-2995.2009.00500.x