About the Author(s)


Tsepo A. Ramatla Email symbol
Department of Animal Health, Faculty of Natural and Agricultural Sciences, North-West University, Mafikeng, South Africa

Nthabiseng Mphuthi symbol
Department of Animal Health, Faculty of Natural and Agricultural Sciences, North-West University, Mafikeng, South Africa

Taole Ramaili symbol
Department of Animal Health, Faculty of Natural and Agricultural Sciences, North-West University, Mafikeng, South Africa

Moeti O. Taioe symbol
National Zoological Garden, South African National Biodiversity Institute, Pretoria, South Africa

Oriel M.M. Thekisoe symbol
Unit for Environmental Sciences and Management, Faculty of Natural and Agricultural Sciences, North-West University, Potchefstroom, South Africa

Michelo Syakalima symbol
Department of Animal Health, Faculty of Natural and Agricultural Sciences, North-West University, Mafikeng, South Africa

Citation


Ramatla, T.A., Mphuthi, N., Ramaili, T., Taioe, M.O., Thekisoe, O.M.M. & Syakalima, M., 2020, ‘Molecular detection of virulence genes in Salmonella spp. isolated from chicken faeces in Mafikeng, South Africa’, Journal of the South African Veterinary Association 91(0), a1994. https://doi.org/10.4102/jsava.v91i0.1994

Original Research

Molecular detection of virulence genes in Salmonella spp. isolated from chicken faeces in Mafikeng, South Africa

Tsepo A. Ramatla, Nthabiseng Mphuthi, Taole Ramaili, Moeti O. Taioe, Oriel M.M. Thekisoe, Michelo Syakalima

Received: 19 June 2019; Accepted: 16 Mar. 2020; Published: 21 July 2020

Copyright: © 2020. The Author(s). Licensee: AOSIS.
This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.

Abstract

Chickens have been implicated in most Salmonella disease outbreaks because they act as carriers of the pathogen in their gut. There are over 2500 serotypes of Salmonella that have been reported worldwide and 2000 of these serovars can be found in chickens. The main objective of this study was to determine the Salmonella serotypes found in poultry farms around Mafikeng district, South Africa. Salmonella was identified according to the guidelines of the International Organization for Standardization (ISO) (ISO 6579:2002) standard techniques. Faecal samples were collected and analysed for Salmonella using conventional cultural methods and polymerase chain reaction targeting the 16S Ribosomal Deoxyribonucleic acid (rDNA) gene for Salmonella identification. Out of 130 presumptive Salmonella isolates determined by urease and triple sugar iron tests, only 46 isolates were identified as Salmonella serotypes of which S. Typhimurium was the most frequent with 18 (39.1%), followed by S. Heidelberg with 9 (19.6%), S. bongori with 7 (15.2%), S. Enteritidis with 6 (13.0%) and both S. Paratyphi B and S. Newport with 3 (6.5%) each. Seven virulence genes including invA 100%, spy 39%, hilA 9%, misL 30%, sdfI 13%, orfL 11% and spiC 9% were detected from these Salmonella isolates in this study. The presence of these virulence genes indicates high pathogenicity potential of these isolates which is a serious public health concern because of zoonotic potential of Salmonella.

Keywords: Salmonella spp.; virulence genes; chicken; South Africa; microbiology.

Introduction

Commercial poultry production is rapidly growing worldwide to meet the needs of the increasing human population (Olobatoke & Mulugeta 2015). Many poor and middle-class farmers in developing countries are taking up poultry to supplement their income, and this industry has become a major income source to them. Therefore, the presence of pathogenic organisms such as Salmonella in chickens, as a major food-borne infection in humans, can have an adverse impact on the production and marketing of poultry (Imanishi et al. 2015). Chickens have been implicated in most of Salmonella outbreaks because they act as carriers of this pathogen in their guts (Black 2008).

Salmonella that can be traced through chickens can be classified into three groups (Hafez 2013). The first group includes highly host adapted and invasive serotypes such as S. typhi in humans and S. gallinarum and S. pullorum in poultry. The second group is non-host-adapted and invasive serotypes such as S. Typhimurium, S. Arizonae and S. Enteritidis. The third group contains non-host-adapted and non-invasive serotypes, and most of these serotypes are harmless to animals and humans (Andino & Hanning 2015; Umali et al. 2012). Understanding the mechanisms of Salmonella infection, intestinal colonisation, persistence and excretion in poultry are essential to discover appropriate measures to decrease both contamination of flocks and public health risk (Andino & Hanning 2015).

Some of these Salmonella spp. can carry or harbour virulence genes (Peixoto et al. 2017) responsible for important characteristics such as intracellular survival (Pathmanathan et al. 2003), as well as the production of Vi capsular antigens and cell invasion (Peixoto et al. 2017). Several virulence genes in Salmonella are known, and most are situated in Salmonella pathogenicity islands (SPIs), prophages, plasmids and fimbrial clusters (Prasanna Kumar 2016). However, the majority of the virulence genes are gathered within SPI-1 and SPI-2 (Marcus et al. 2000). The SPI-1 encodes factors vital for cell adhesion, while SPI-2 encodes factors essential for replication and intracellular survival (Majowicz et al. 2010). The SPIs play important roles in invasion, antibiotic resistance, adhesion, systemic infection, fimbrial expression, toxin production, intracellular survival, and Mg2+ and iron uptake (Kim & Ju Lee 2017; Majowicz et al. 2010).

The role played by the virulence genes of Salmonella species, are known based on observations made on epithelial cells. The invA gene for instance affects the host cell by delivery of type III secreted effectors, for mutant phenotype, and is also essential for invasion of epithelial cells (El-Sharkawy et al. 2017; Marcus et al. 2000). The invA gene has been confirmed to be present in Salmonella species only and hence is used in the genetic diagnosis of Salmonella species (Fekry, Ammar & Hussien 2018).

The operon spv (Salmonella plasmid virulence) is considered as one of the virulence plasmids of numerous Salmonella serotypes that generate systemic disease (Castilla et al. 2006). It harbours five genes spvRABCD (Rotger & Casadesús 1999) that have been identified to contribute to its pathogenicity (Card et al. 2016; Haneda et al. 2012). The presence of HilA gene in Salmonella is essential for the expression of the type III secretion system (TTSS) components, and it encodes the central regulator HilA (Borges et al. 2013). This gene (HilA) is required to induce apoptosis of macrophages and invade epithelial cells (Borges et al. 2013). The sipC gene acts as a translocase, mediating bacterial entry into epithelial (Prasad 2012). On the other hand, spiC acts to modulate invasion gene expression (Hayward & Koronakis 1999).

The main objective of this study was to detect prevalent Salmonella serotypes in chicken faeces from poultry farms around Mafikeng in South Africa and assess the presence of virulence genes using conventional polymerase chain reaction (PCR) assays.

Materials and methods

Sampling site

The study area covered Mafikeng in North West Province, South Africa, as shown in Figure 1. The province is the second largest chicken producer in South Africa at 21.3% after the Western Cape with 21.9%. The longitude and latitude of the district are 25°50′E and 25°55′N, respectively. Temperatures range from 3 °C to 21 °C in the winter and from 17 °C to 31 °C in the summer. The average rainfall is 360 mm.

FIGURE 1: Map of South Africa, the red part, shows Mafikeng within the North West province.

Sample collection

A list of poultry farms in the Mafikeng area was compiled using the records of the provincial Department of Agriculture of North West provincial government. A few farms in the south, east, north and west were randomly selected, the farmers were approached and those who agreed were included in the study. Sampling sites were therefore conveniently selected. Sterile spatulas were used to collect samples of freshly passed poultry droppings in sterile universal sampling bottles.

Samples were collected at three different points in each poultry farm once a week. This was performed to have a good representation and distribution of the organisms. After collection, samples were packed in properly labelled sterile polyethylene bags and transported in a sterilised icebox and processed immediately upon arrival to the laboratory.

Isolation and identification of Salmonella

Each faecal sample (1 g) was weighed and transferred into a sterile container. A volume of 10 mL of buffered peptone water (BPW Oxoid, Biolab, South Africa) was added into each sample and then homogenised by vortexing for about 2 minutes followed by incubation at 37 °C ± 1 °C for 18 hours - 24 hours Thereafter, 1 mL of the sample was transferred to 10 mL of Mueller–Kauffmann Tetrathionate Novobiocin (MKTTn) broth (Sigma-Aldrich, S.A. Barcelona, Spain) which was incubated at 4.5 °C for 6 h. Then, 1 mL was transferred from MKTTnB to 10 mL of Rappaport–Vassiliadis medium with soya (RVS) broth (Sigma-Aldrich, S.A. India) and incubated at 36 °C for 24 h. A 1 mL aliquot from the RVS broth was then transferred to a 30% glycerol solution (EMD chemicals, United States [US]) and stored at −20 °C for later use.

Culturing of Salmonella on selective agar plates

After incubation, a loopful of the enriched cultures of RVS broth was streaked separately onto two selective agar plates: Xylose Lysine Deoxycholate agar (XLD) (Merck, Wadeville, South Africa) and Brilliant Green Agar (BGA) (Scharlau Chemie S.A. Barcelona). These plates were incubated in an overturned position at 37 °C ± 1 °C for 18 h – 24 h. Following incubation, the black and pink colonies with or without black centre on XLD agar, the colourless or opaque white colonies surrounded by pink or red zone and the red colonies on BGA were identified as suspected Salmonella. Suspected colonies of Salmonella spp. were then confirmed according to the guidelines of ISO 6579: 2002. Such colonies were picked out and streaked on Nutrient agar (NA) (Merck, Wadeville, South Africa) and incubated at 37 °C ± 1 °C for 18 h - 24 h.

Biochemical identification

All gram-negative, rod-shaped bacteria were subjected to preliminary biochemical tests. The presumptive identification of Salmonella colonies was carried out using urease and triple sugar iron (TSI) tests. Two to three purified colonies of the presumptive Salmonella isolates from the 24-h NA plates were subjected to the urea broth and incubated at 37 °C for 18 h – 24 h. Presumptive Salmonella colonies were also carried out by stabbing the butt of TSI slants, and the slants were incubated at 37 °C and examined after 18 h – 24 h for gas production, hydrogen sulphide production and carbohydrate fermentation. The analytical profile index (API) 20E (BioMerieux, Marcy l’Etoile, France) was used for identification, and indices were generated for the diverse isolates and used to verify their identities using the API webTM identification software. Biochemical identification was performed in order to get presumptive positives and as part of a large set of other experiments that were being conducted on the samples.

Genomic deoxyribonucleic acid extraction

Genomic deoxyribonucleic acid (DNA) was extracted using Fungal/Bacterial Soil Microbe DNA Mini Prep kit according to the manufacturer’s instructions (Zymo-Research, US). Extracted DNA was eluted with 100 µL of DNA elution buffer into clean 1.5 mL micro-centrifuge tube and stored at −20 °C for molecular confirmation of the Salmonella species and detection of virulence genes.

Molecular identification of Salmonella serovars using 16S rDNA gene

Polymerase chain reactions were conducted using the Universal primers: forward (5’-AGA GTT TGA TCC TGG CTC AG-3’) and the Reverse (5’-ACG GCT ACC TTG TTA CGA CTT-3’), with the reaction volume of 25 µL containing 12.5 µL PCR Master Mix, 2 µL template DNA, 8.5 µL nuclease free water and 1 µL of each oligonucleotide primer using an Engine T100 ThermalTM cycler (Bio-Rad, Singapore). The thermo cycling conditions consisted of an initial denaturation step at 95 °C for 5 min followed by 35 cycles of denaturation at 94 °C for 30 s, annealing at 61 °C for 30 s and extension at 72 °C for 5 min, and finally a single and final extension step at 72 °C for 7 min. Polymerase chain reaction products were identified by electrophoresis on 2% (weight per volumne [w/v]) agarose gel stained with ethidium and visualised under ultraviolet light on a ChemiDoc Imaging System (Bio-Rad ChemiDocTM MP Imaging System, Hertfordshire, United Kingdom).

Deoxyribonucleic acid sequencing

Amplified PCR products were sequenced using an ABI PRISM® 3500XL DNA Sequencer (Applied Biosystems) at Inqaba Biotechnical Industrial (Pty) Ltd. (Pretoria, South Africa). The acquired sequences were aligned on GenBank database using Basic Local Alignment Search Tool (BLAST) (www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/BLAST) from the National Center for Biotechnology Information (NCBI) to identify sequences with high similarity.

Detection of virulence genes using polymerase chain reaction

Seven pairs of published oligonucleotide primers were used to detect the virulence genes using PCR. The individual PCRs, for each virulent gene, were set up in a 25 µL, which consisted of 12.5 µL AmpliTaq Gold® 360 PCR Master Mix (AmpliTaq Gold® DNA Polymerase 0.05 units/µL, Gold buffer 930 mM Tris/HCl pH 8.05, 100 mM KClO, 400 mM of each dNTP and 5 mM MgCl2) (Applied Biosystems, California, US). Then, 2.5 mM of each primer, 2 µL of template DNA and ddH2O were added to make the final volume. Test DNA was replaced with 5 µL of sterile nuclease-free water as negative control. Cycling conditions for PCR as well as the information of the published primers used are detailed in Table 1.

TABLE 1: Primers sequences, source of primers for amplification and polymerase chain reaction conditions used for in this study.
Phylogenetic analysis

All confirmed sequencing results were edited by using Bio-Edit software (Hall 1999) and saved as FASTA format. The sequences were used to search the GenBank database with the BLASTn algorithm to find out the relative Phylogenetic positions. The sequences were aligned by using the multiple alignment fast Fourier transform (MAFFT) programme 6.8464 to conduct multiple and pairwise sequence alignments against corresponding nucleotide sequences retrieved from GenBank. Evolutionary distance matrices were generated as described previously by Jukes and Cantor (1969). Phylogenetic analysis was performed using MEGA version 7 (Kumar, Stecher & Tamura 2016), and neighbour-joining (NJ), maximum-parsimony, and maximum likelihood methods were used for the construction of the trees. Bootstrap analyses were performed using 1000 replications for NJ, maximum-parsimony, maximum likelihood. Recognised chimeric sequences were identified using the Chimera Buster 1.0 software. Manipulation and tree editing were carried out using Tree View (Timme et al. 2013).

Statistical analysis

Descriptive statistics, particularly proportions, percentages, means and standard deviations, were determined using Excel software (2013).

Ethical considerations

Prior to the commencement of the study, the research proposal was approved based on Animal Research Ethics Committee (NWU-00274-18-A5) guidelines by North-West University Research Ethics Regulatory Committee (NWU-RERC).

Results

Prevalence of Salmonella infection in chicken’s droppings

Out of 130 presumptive Salmonella isolates, only 46 (35.4%) isolates were identified as Salmonella species after blasting to identify sequences with high similarity. The predominant Salmonella serovars isolated were S. Typhimurium 18 (39.1%), S. Heidelberg 9 (19.6%), S. bongori 7 (15.2%), S. Enteritidis 6 (13.0%), S. enterica Paratyphi B 3 (6.5%) and S. Newport 3 (6.5%). The sequences obtained from this study are accessible from GenBank database and were given accession numbers, as shown in Table 2.

TABLE 2: Results of 46 isolates for analytical profile index, 16S Ribosomal ribonucleic acid sequencing (polymerase chain reaction) and accession number.
Phylogenetic analysis of the Salmonella isolates from chickens

A phylogenetic tree for Salmonella isolates from chickens was constructed to understand the genetic closeness of Salmonella strains with other related strains from different countries inside and outside the African continent. Shigella fleneri (KY199565) from the family Enterobacteriaceae was used as an out-group for the 16S-Ribosomal Deoxyribonucleic acid gene. The resulting NJ revealed that strain S. Heidelberg clustered closely with sequences of the following S. Heidelberg: CP004086.1, originating from retail meats, humans and animals; CP016586.1, originating from food sources, human and animal; S. Tennessee: CP024164, originating from laboratory control strains and CP025217.1, originating from the food industry; S. bongori: MF289161.1, originating from the crops, and MG663480.1, originating from chicken faeces; S. enterica Paratyphi; CP006575.1, originating from bacteria strain obtained from source laboratory of Zoonosis; S. Typhimurium: CP014971.2, originating from humans and cattle; S. Enteritidis: CP018651.1, originating from the historical S. Enteritidis isolated between the 1940s and 1990s. The phylogenetic tree is shown in Figure 2.

FIGURE 2: The phylogenetic relationship of Salmonella detected in the faeces from chickens. The tree was clustered with the neighbour-joining method using MEGA 7 package. Bootstrap values based on 1000 replications were listed as percentages at the nodes. The GenBank accession numbers are indicated at the branches of the tree. The scale bar indicates 0.01 substitutions per nucleotide position. Bootstrap values > 60% are shown.

Distribution of virulence genes among Salmonella isolates

A representative detection of Salmonella virulence genes is shown in Table 3. The results revealed that 100% isolates were harbouring invA gene, 39% harboured spy gene, 9% harboured hilA gene, 30.1% harboured misL gene and 13% harboured sdfI gene, while 11% harboured orfL gene and only 9% harboured spiC gene.

TABLE 3: Prevalence of detected virulence genes from Salmonella isolates.

Discussion

The primary objective of this study was to isolate and detect the types of Salmonella spp. from chicken droppings around Mafikeng, South Africa. Six Salmonella serovars were isolated, namely S. Typhimurium, S. Heidelberg, S. bongori, S. Enteritidis, S. Paratyphi B and S. Newport. All these serovars are known to be pathogenic in humans and cause salmonellosis (Fagbamila et al. 2017; Orji, Onuigbo & Mbata 2005; Tejada et al. 2016). Among the Salmonella isolates detected from this study, S. Typhimurium, S. Enteritidis and S. Newport have previously been reported in raw broiler samples by another study here in Mafikeng, South Africa (Olobatoke & Mulugeta 2015). The presence of these isolates, especially S. Typhimurium and S. Enteritidis as determined by this study, is a concern because they are known to cause serious human illness (Alvarez et al. 2004; Lapuz et al. 2008). A previous study of Salmonella isolates in South Africa undertaken by Kidanemariam, Engelbrecht and Picard (2010) between 1999 and 2006 revealed the 10 common Salmonella serotypes isolated: S. Newport, S. Typhimurium, S. Dublin, S. Enteritidis, S. Muenchen, S. Chester, S. Heidelberg, S. Hadar, S. Schwarzengrund and S. Mbandaka. Our study did not isolate all these Salmonella species in the Mafikeng chicken samples but agrees with that study which identifies S. Typhimurium as the most prevalent isolate in poultry (Kidanemariam et al. 2010).

Many poor and middle-class farmers in developing countries are taking up poultry to supplement their income, and this industry has become a major income source to them. Unfortunately, there has also been an increase in human salmonellosis cases, and these have been linked with consumption of contaminated chicken products (Imanishi et al. 2015; Lebert et al. 2018; Olobatoke & Mulugeta 2015). Four of the serotypes detected in this study, namely S. Typhimurium, S. Enteritidis, S. Newport and S. Heidelberg, are in the top five most frequently isolated serotypes in poultry meat and in human disease in South Africa and elsewhere as indicated by the phylogenetic analysis. For example, S. Heidelberg was associated with the 2011 outbreak, Salmonella outbreak, in South Africa (Kidanemariam et al. 2010); S. Typhimurium was responsible for salmonellosis outbreak in Australia and in Germany from 2001 to 2005 (De Freitas Neto et al. 2010) and 63 Salmonella outbreaks in Italy (De Freitas Neto et al. 2010). Additionally, the majority of Salmonella cases worldwide are caused by S. serovar Enteritidis, from eggs and poultry meat (Backhans & Fellström 2012). Salmonella enterica serovar Paratyphi B has been linked with human outbreaks in the different countries like US (Harris et al. 2009), Australia (Levings et al. 2006), Canada (Stratton et al. 2001) and European countries (Miko et al. 2002). This is noteworthy as it highlights the possibility that the detected strains from this study may also play a significant role in human disease here in the province if proper sanitary measures are not applied. The phylogenetic analysis also revealed that the Salmonella isolates found in this study are very similar to other genotypes previously identified in several other sources, including humans, milk, chickens and other animals. This therefore indicates that the strains that were found in chickens could easily be circulating in other poultry, livestock, animal products and/or humans.

The disease causing potential of Salmonella isolates is derived from the virulent genes that they may carry. So, this study undertook to determine the presence of these virulent genes to understand how potentially pathogenic the strains were (Ekwanzala et al. 2017; Sunar et al. 2014). Forty-six (n = 46) Salmonella isolates were analysed for the presence of seven known virulence genes, namely invA, SdfI, hilA, misL, Spy, orfL and spiC. It was interesting to note that all the tested virulence genes were detected by this study in differing proportions. All 46 (n = 46) isolates were positive for invA, indicating that all of them have the ability to invade and to cause gastroenteritis (Ekwanzala et al. 2017; Hu et al. 2008; Lan et al. 2018; Odjadjare & Olaniran 2015; Sunar et al. 2014) and can survive in macrophages (Goodman et al. 2017). The inner membrane of Salmonella contains protein coded for by invA, which is vital for invasion into epithelial cells (Salehi, Mahzounieh & Saeedzadeh 2005). This gene (invA) is found in Pathogenicity island-1 and it is a TTSS apparatus, which secretes invasion effectors like invasion factor A (Sabbagh et al. 2010). Eighteen isolates harboured spy, and these isolates were identified as those of S. Typhimurium. This gene has been used to identify and confirm S. Typhimurium (Can et al. 2014). The spy gene appears to exclusively act as a molecular chaperone (Wells 2015) and thus confers pathogenicity to this strain. The Sdf I gene has been used to identify S. Enteritidis (Mohd Afendy & Son 2015). Salmonella serovars encoding spy and Sdf I (S. Typhimurium and S. Enteritidis) are known to be associated with human illness (Odjadjare & Olaniran 2015).

Out of 46 Salmonella isolates, 14 were identified as harbouring the misL gene. This gene aids virulence by being involved in the intra-macrophage survival of the pathogen (Hughes et al. 2008). The misL gene is located in the SPI-3 of Salmonella (Zishiri et al. 2016). The orfL and spiC genes were positive from five and four isolates, respectively. The spiC gene is one of the virulence factors of Salmonella which is found in island 2 and associated with type 3 effector protein. It normally disrupts the vesicular transport of the host cell (Kaur & Jain 2012). The orfL gene, on the other hand, has a secretion system that mediates the secretion of toxins and is necessary for macrophages survival (Odjadjare & Olaniran 2015).

The presence of these genes in the isolates from Mafikeng therefore shows that these strains are of public health importance and can cause disease when and if contamination is not properly managed.

Conclusion

This study has identified Salmonella isolates that have traditionally been associated with disease not only in South Africa but elsewhere in the world. These isolates have the virulent genes that are important for pathogenesis and therefore are of serious public health concern and measures should be put to control disease outbreaks in Mafikeng specifically and South Africa in general.

Acknowledgements

The authors acknowledge the North-West University Postgraduate Bursary, Faculty of Natural and Agricultural Sciences and the Department of Animal Health, North-West University Mafikeng Campus, for providing financial support for this study.

Competing interests

The authors declare that no competing interests exist.

Authors’ contributions

T.R. performed the experiments and wrote the first draft. O.M.M.T. facilitated student supervision and edited the manuscript. M.O.T. provided the analysis tools, analysed the data and reviewed the manuscript. M.S. conceived and designed the experiments, provided reagents and materials, and wrote the final article. N.M. and T.M. made sufficient resources and facilities available for the molecular work and edited the manuscript. All authors contributed to the write-up of this article.

Funding information

This work was supported by the funds made available by NWU Postgraduate Bursary, Faculty of Natural and Agricultural Sciences and the Department of Animal Health, North-West University Mafikeng Campus.

Data availability statement

Data sharing is not applicable to this article as no new data were created or analysed in this study.

Disclaimer

The views and opinions expressed in this article are those of the authors and do not necessarily reflect the official policy or position of any affiliated agency of the authors.

References

Alvarez, J., Sota, M., Vivanco, A.B., Perales, I., Cisterna, R., Rementeria, A. et al., 2004, ‘Development of a multiplex PCR technique for detection and epidemiological typing of Salmonella in human clinical samples’, Journal of Clinical Microbiology 42(4), 1734–1738. https://doi.org/10.1128/JCM.42.4.1734-1738.2004

Andino, A. & Hanning, I., 2015, ‘Salmonella enterica: Survival, colonization, and virulence differences among serovars’, The Scientific World Journal 2015, 520179. https://doi.org/10.1155/2015/520179

Backhans, A. & Fellström, C., 2012, ‘Rodents on pig and chicken farms-a potential threat to human and animal health’, Infection Ecology & Epidemiology 2, 17093. https://doi.org/10.3402/iee.v2i0.17093

Black, J.G., 2008, Microbiology: Principles and explorations, New Jersey, John Wiley & Sons.

Borges, K.A., Furian, T.Q., Borsoi, A., Moraes, H.L., Salle, C.T. & Nascimento, V.P., 2013, ‘Detection of virulence-associated genes in Salmonella Enteritidis isolates from chicken in South of Brazil’, Pesquisa Veterinaria Brasileira 33(12), 1416–1422. https://doi.org/10.1590/S0100-736X2013001200004

Can, H.Y., Elmali, M., Karagöz, A. & Öner, S., 2014, ‘Detection of Salmonella spp., Salmonella Enteritidis, Salmonella Typhi and Salmonella Typhimurium in cream cakes by polymerase chain reaction (PCR)’, Medycyna Weterynaryjna 70, 689–692.

Card, R., Vaughan, K., Bagnall, M., Spiropoulos, J., Cooley, W., Strickland, T. et al., 2016, ‘Virulence characterisation of Salmonella enterica isolates of differing antimicrobial resistance recovered from UK livestock and imported meat samples’, Frontiers in Microbiology 7, 640. https://doi.org/10.3389/fmicb.2016.00640

Castilla, K.S., Ferreira, C.S.A., Moreno, A.M., Nunes, I.A. & Ferreira, A.J.P., 2006, ‘Distribution of virulence genes sefC, pefA and spvC in Salmonella Enteritidis phage type 4 strains isolated in Brazil’, Brazilian Journal of Microbiology 37(2), 135–139. https://doi.org/10.1590/S1517-83822006000200007

De Freitas Neto, O., Penha Filho, R., Barrow, P. & Berchieri Junior, A., 2010, ‘Sources of human non-typhoid salmonellosis: A review’, Revista Brasileira de Ciência Avícola 12(1), 01–11. https://doi.org/10.1590/S1516-635X2010000100001

Ekwanzala, M.D., Abia, A.L.K., Keshri, J. & Momba, M.N.B., 2017, ‘Genetic characterization of Salmonella and Shigella spp. isolates recovered from water and riverbed sediment of the Apies River, South Africa’, Water SA 43(3), 387–397. https://doi.org/10.4314/wsa.v43i3.03

El-Sharkawy, H., Tahoun, A., El-Gohary, A.E.-G.A., El-Abasy, M., El-Khayat, F., Gillespie, T. et al., 2017, ‘Epidemiological, molecular characterization and antibiotic resistance of Salmonella enterica serovars isolated from chicken farms in Egypt’, Gut Pathogens 9, 8. https://doi.org/10.1186/s13099-017-0157-1

Fagbamila, I.O., Barco, L., Mancin, M., Kwaga, J., Ngulukun, S.S., Zavagnin, P. et al., 2017, ‘Salmonella serovars and their distribution in Nigerian commercial chicken layer farms’, PLoS One 12, e0173097. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0173097

Fekry, E., Ammar, A.M. & Hussien, A., 2018, ‘Molecular detection of InvA, OmpA and Stn genes in Salmonella serovars from broilers in Egypt’, Alexandria Journal for Veterinary Sciences 56, 69–74. https://doi.org/10.5455/ajvs.288089

Goodman, L.B., McDonough, P.L., Anderson, R.R., Franklin-Guild, R.J., Ryan, J.R., Perkins, G.A. et al., 2017, ‘Detection of Salmonella spp. in veterinary samples by combining selective enrichment and real-time PCR’, Journal of Veterinary Diagnostic Investigation 29(6), 844–851. https://doi.org/10.1177/1040638717728315

Hafez, H.M., 2013, ‘10 Salmonella infections in Turkeys’, Salmonella in Domestic Animals, 2nd edn., p. 193. https://doi.org/10.1079/9781845939021.0193

Hall, T.A., 1999, ‘BioEdit: a user-friendly biological sequence alignment editor and analysis program for Windows 95/98/NT’, Nucleic Acids Symp. Ser 41, 95–98.

Haneda, T., Ishii, Y., Shimizu, H., Ohshima, K., Iida, N., Danbara, H. et al., 2012, ‘Salmonella type III effector SpvC, a phosphothreonine lyase, contributes to reduction in inflammatory response during intestinal phase of infection’, Cellular Microbiology 14(4), 485–499. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1462-5822.2011.01733.x

Harris, J.R., Bergmire-Sweat, D., Schlegel, J.H., Winpisinger, K.A., Klos, R.F., Perry, C.T. et al., 2009, ‘Multistate outbreak of Salmonella infections associated with small turtle exposure, 2007–2008’, Pediatrics 124(5), 1388–1394. https://doi.org/10.1542/peds.2009-0272

Hayward, R.D. & Koronakis, V., 1999, ‘Direct nucleation and bundling of actin by the SipC protein of invasive Salmonella’, The EMBO Journal 18(18), 4926–4934. https://doi.org/10.1093/emboj/18.18.4926

Hu, Q., Coburn, B., Deng, W., Li, Y., Shi, X., Lan, Q. et al., 2008, ‘Salmonella enterica serovar Senftenberg human clinical isolates lacking SPI-1’, Journal of Clinical Microbiology 46(4), 1330–1336. https://doi.org/10.1128/JCM.01255-07

Hughes, L.A., Shopland, S., Wigley, P., Bradon, H., Leatherbarrow, A.H., Williams, N.J. et al., 2008, ‘Characterisation of Salmonella enterica serotype Typhimurium isolates from wild birds in northern England from 2005–2006’, BMC Veterinary Research 4, 4. https://doi.org/10.1186/1746-6148-4-4

Imanishi, M., Newton, A., Vieira, A., Gonzalez-Aviles, G., Scott, M.K., Manikonda, K. et al., 2015, ‘Typhoid fever acquired in the United States, 1999–2010: Epidemiology, microbiology, and use of a space–time scan statistic for outbreak detection’, Epidemiology & Infection 143(11), 2343–2354. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0950268814003021

Jukes, T.H. & Cantor, C.R., 1969, ‘Evolution of protein molecules’, Mammalian Protein Metabolism 3, 132. https://doi.org/10.1016/B978-1-4832-3211-9.50009-7

Kaur, J. & Jain, S., 2012, ‘Role of antigens and virulence factors of Salmonella enterica serovar Typhi in its pathogenesis’, Microbiological Research 167(4), 199–210. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.micres.2011.08.001

Kidanemariam, A., Engelbrecht, M. & Picard, J., 2010, ‘Retrospective study on the incidence of Salmonella isolations in animals in South Africa, 1996 to 2006’, Journal of the South African Veterinary Association 81(1), 37–44. https://doi.org/10.4102/jsava.v81i1.94

Kim, J.E. & ju Lee, Y., 2017, ‘Molecular characterization of antimicrobial resistant non-typhoidal Salmonella from poultry industries in Korea’, Irish Veterinary Journal 70, 20. https://doi.org/10.1186/s13620-017-0095-8

Kumar, S., Stecher, G. & Tamura, K., 2016, ‘MEGA7: Molecular Evolutionary Genetics Analysis version 7.0 for bigger datasets’, Molecular Biology and Evolution 33(7), 1870–1874. https://doi.org/10.1093/molbev/msw054

Lan, T.T., Gaucher, M.L., Nhan, N.T., Letellier, A. & Quessy, S., 2018, ‘Distribution of virulence genes among Salmonella serotypes isolated from pigs in Southern Vietnam’, Journal of Food Protection 81(9), 1459–1466. https://doi.org/10.4315/0362-028X.JFP-17-408

Lapuz, R., Tani, H., Sasai, K., Shirota, K., Katoh, H. & Baba, E., 2008, ‘The role of roof rats (Rattus rattus) in the spread of Salmonella Enteritidis and S. Infantis contamination in layer farms in eastern Japan’, Epidemiology and Infection 136(9), 1235–1243. https://doi.org/10.1017/S095026880700948X

Lebert, L., Martz, S.L., Janecko, N., Deckert, A.E., Agunos, A., Reid, A. et al., 2018, ‘Prevalence and antimicrobial resistance among Escherichia coli and Salmonella in Ontario smallholder chicken flocks’, Zoonoses and Public Health 65(1), 134–141. https://doi.org/10.1111/zph.12381

Levings, R.S., Lightfoot, D., Hall, R.M. & Djordjevic, S.P., 2006, ‘Aquariums as reservoirs for multidrug-resistant Salmonella Paratyphi B’, Emerging Infectious Diseases 12(3), 507–510. https://doi.org/10.3201/eid1203.051085

Majowicz, S.E., Musto, J., Scallan, E., Angulo, F.J., Kirk, M., O’Brien, S.J. et al., 2010, ‘The global burden of nontyphoidal Salmonella gastroenteritis’, Clinical Infectious Diseases 50(6), 882–889. https://doi.org/10.1086/650733

Marcus, S.L., Brumell, J.H., Pfeifer, C.G. & Finlay, B.B., 2000, ‘Salmonella pathogenicity islands: Big virulence in small packages’, Microbes and Infection 2(2), 145–156. https://doi.org/10.1016/S1286-4579(00)00273-2

Miko, A., Guerra, B., Schroeter, A., Dorn, C. & Helmuth, R., 2002, ‘Molecular characterization of multiresistant d-tartrate-positive Salmonella enterica serovar Paratyphi B isolates’, Journal of Clinical Microbiology 40(9), 3184–3191. https://doi.org/10.1128/JCM.40.9.3184-3191.2002

Modarressi, S. & Thong, K.L., 2010, ‘Isolation and molecular sub typing of Salmonella enterica from chicken, beef and street foods in Malaysia’, Scientific Research and Essays 5, 2713–2720.

Mohd Afendy, A. & Son, R., 2015, ‘Pre-enrichment effect on PCR detection of Salmonella Enteritidis in artificially-contaminated raw chicken meat’, International Food Research Journal 22, 2571–2576.

Odjadjare, E.C. & Olaniran, A.O., 2015, ‘Prevalence of antimicrobial resistant and virulent Salmonella spp. in treated effluent and receiving aquatic milieu of wastewater treatment plants in Durban, South Africa’, International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health 12(8), 9692–9713. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijerph120809692

Olobatoke, R.Y. & Mulugeta, S.D., 2015, ‘Incidence of non-typhoidal Salmonella in poultry products in the North West Province, South Africa’, South African Journal of Science 111(11/12), 1–7. https://doi.org/10.17159/sajs.2015/20140233

Orji, M.U., Onuigbo, H.C. & Mbata, T.I., 2005, ‘Isolation of Salmonella from poultry droppings and other environmental sources in Awka, Nigeria’, International Journal of Infectious Diseases 9(2), 86–89. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijid.2004.04.016

Pathmanathan, S., Cardona-Castro, N., Sanchez-Jimenez, M., Correa-Ochoa, M., Puthucheary, S. & Thong, K., 2003, ‘Simple and rapid detection of Salmonella strains by direct PCR amplification of the hilA gene’, Journal of Medical Microbiology 52(Pt 9), 773–776. https://doi.org/10.1099/jmm.0.05188-0

Peixoto, R.J., Alves, E.S., Wang, M., Ferreira, R.B., Granato, A., Han, J. et al., 2017, ‘Repression of Salmonella host cell invasion by aromatic small molecules from the human fecal metabolome’, Applied and Environmental Microbiology 83(19), 01148–01117. https://doi.org/10.1128/AEM.01148-17

Prasad, K., 2012, ‘Clinical significance HIV-positive patients appear to be at an increased risk of acquiring Salmonella infection’, in D. Dionisio (ed.), AIDS patients, Salmonella gastroenteritis is most often due to the nontyphoidal species (Salmonella serotype). Textbook-Atlas of Intestinal Infections in AIDS, p. 271.

Prasanna Kumar, V., 2016, Studies on virulence, antimicrobial resistance and genetic diversity of Salmonella typhimurium isolates from North India, GB Pant University of Agriculture and Technology, Pantnagar.

Rotger, R. & Casadesús, J., 1999, ‘The virulence plasmids of Salmonella’, International Microbiology 2(3), 177–184.

Sabbagh, S.C., Forest, C.G., Lepage, C., Leclerc, J.M. & Daigle, F., 2010, ‘So similar, yet so different: Uncovering distinctive features in the genomes of Salmonella enterica serovars Typhimurium and Typhi’, FEMS Microbiology Letters 305(1), 1–13. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1574-6968.2010.01904.x

Salehi, T.Z., Mahzounieh, M. & Saeedzadeh, A., 2005, ‘Detection of invA gene in isolated Salmonella from broilers by PCR method’, International Journal of Poultry Science 4(8), 557–559. https://doi.org/10.3923/ijps.2005.557.559

show me, n.d., Maps of South Africa (Mafikeng, Ngaka Modiri Molema), viewed 17 May 2019, from https://showme.co.za/facts-about-south-africa/the-maps-of-south-africa.

Stratton, J., Stefaniw, L., Grimsrud, K., Werker, D., Ellis, A., Ashton, E. et al., 2001, ‘Outbreak of Salmonella Paratyphi B var java due to contaminated alfalfa sprouts in Alberta, British Columbia and Saskatchewan’, Canada Communicable Disease Report 27(16), 133–137.

Sunar, N., Stentiford, E., Stewart, D. & Fletcher, L., 2014, ‘Molecular techniques to characterize the invA genes of Salmonella spp. for pathogen inactivation study in composting’, arXiv preprint arXiv:1404.5208, Cornell University, New York.

Tejada, T., Silva, C., Lopes, N., Silva, D., Agostinetto, A., Silva, E. et al., 2016, ‘DNA profiles of Salmonella spp. isolated from chicken products and from broiler and human feces’, Revista Brasileira de Ciência Avícola 18(4), 693–700. https://doi.org/10.1590/1806-9061-2016-0316

Timme, R.E., Pettengill, J.B., Allard, M.W., Strain, E., Barrangou, R., Wehnes, C. et al., 2013, ‘Phylogenetic diversity of the enteric pathogen Salmonella enterica subsp. enterica inferred from genome-wide reference-free SNP characters’, Genome Biology and Evolution 5(11), 2109–2123. https://doi.org/10.1093/gbe/evt159

Umali, D.V., Lapuz, R.R.S.P., Suzuki, T., Shirota, K. & Katoh, H., 2012, ‘Transmission and shedding patterns of Salmonella in naturally infected captive wild roof rats (Rattus rattus) from a Salmonella-contaminated layer farm’, Avian Diseases 56(2), 288–294. https://doi.org/10.1637/9911-090411-Reg.1

Wells, H., 2015, ‘Further characterisation of the envelope stress responses of Salmonella Typhimurium’, Doctoral thesis, University of East Anglia, viewed 23 May 2019, from https://ueaeprints.uea.ac.uk/id/eprint/59224/1/H.C.WELLS_(4006879)_-PhDThesis_Sept_2015.pdf.

Zishiri, O.T., Mkhize, N. & Mukaratirwa, S., 2016, ‘Prevalence of virulence and antimicrobial resistance genes in Salmonella spp. isolated from commercial chickens and human clinical isolates from South Africa and Brazil’, Onderstepoort Journal of Veterinary Research 83, 1–11. https://doi.org/10.4102/ojvr.v83i1.1067



Crossref Citations

No related citations found.