Original Research
Validity of somatic cell count as indicator of pathogen-specific intramammary infections
Submitted: 05 August 2016 | Published: 13 April 2017
About the author(s)
Inge-Marié Petzer, Department of Production Animal Studies, University of Pretoria, South AfricaJoanne Karzis, Department of Production Animal Studies, University of Pretoria, South Africa
Edward F. Donkin, Department of Animal and Wildlife Sciences, University of Pretoria, South Africa
Edward C. Webb, Department of Animal and Wildlife Sciences, University of Pretoria, South Africa
Eric M.C. Etter, Department of Production Animal Studies, University of Pretoria, South Africa; Department Environment and Societies, French Agricultural Research Centre for International Development (CIRAD), France
Abstract
The objective of this study was to determine whether somatic cell count (SCC) was an effective test, with a sensitivity exceeding 85%, to determine species-specific bacterial infections. In addition, the relation between the SCC and various udder pathogen groups was investigated. SCC thresholds of greater than 200 000 cells/mL were used in quarter and greater than 150 000 cells/mL in composite milk samples. A retrospective study was conducted on a data set for 89 635 quarter and 345 467 composite cow milk samples. Eleven SCC threshold values were used to evaluate the diagnostic efficacy for the following bacteria: Gram-positive major pathogens: Staphylococcus aureus, Streptococcus agalactiae, Streptococcus dysgalactiae and Streptococcus uberis; Gram-negative major pathogens: Escherichia coli, Klebsiella pneumonia and Serratia spp.; minor pathogens: coagulase-negative staphylococci, Micrococcus spp., Staphylococcus pseudintermedius, Streptococcus pyogenes, Enterococcus faecalis, Enterococcus canis, Trueperella pyogenes and other Enterobacteriaceae. Sensitivity and specificity were calculated taking the effect of clustering into account with quarter milk samples. Most samples yielding major Gram-positive pathogens (88.9% in quarter and 79.9% in composite samples) and minor pathogens (61.4% in quarter and 51.7% in composite samples) had SCC greater than 200 000 cells/mL. Sensitivity of the SCC test to detect major pathogens at an SCC threshold of greater than 200 000 cells/mL in quarter samples and greater than 150 000 cells/mL in composite milk samples was 88.2% and 84.2%, respectively, but specificity was low (57.7% and 52.8%, respectively).
Keywords
Metrics
Total abstract views: 4555Total article views: 5857
Crossref Citations
1. Evaluation of three Staphylococcus aureus proteins involved in the adhesion process as antigens for the detection of bovine intramammary infections
Giovanny Torres, Miryan Sánchez-Jiménez, Julián Reyes-Vélez, Horacio Bach, Martha Olivera-Angel
Journal of Medical Microbiology
vol: 71 issue: 12 year: 2022
doi: 10.1099/jmm.0.001613
2. Short communication: Characterization of Staphylococcus aureus from bulk tank milk of dairy cattle in Lombardy (northern Italy)
A. Gazzola, A.M. Maisano, V. Bianchini, F. Vezzoli, A. Romanò, H.U. Graber, P. Cremonesi, G. Zanardi, V. Cappa, M. Luini
Journal of Dairy Science vol: 103 issue: 3 first page: 2685 year: 2020
doi: 10.3168/jds.2019-17181
3. Characterisation of Staphylococci Isolated from Milk Samples of a Water Buffalo Herd
Christiaan Labuschagne, Joanne Karzis, Hans Britz, Inge-Marié Petzer
Antibiotics vol: 11 issue: 11 first page: 1609 year: 2022
doi: 10.3390/antibiotics11111609
4. Analysis of the Somatic Cell Pattern in Mastitis - Affected Cows on Three Dairy Farms in Vojvodina
Nadežda Tešin, Miodrag Radinović, Dragana Tomanić, Zoran Ružić, Jovan Stanojević, Ivan Galić, Zorana Kovačević
Contemporary Agriculture vol: 72 issue: 4 first page: 175 year: 2023
doi: 10.2478/contagri-2023-0023
5. Relationship between somatic cell count and occurrence of intramammary pathogens in dairy cows
Vladimír Hisira, Róbert Klein, Marián Kadaši, Ján Pošivák
The Animal Biology vol: 21 issue: 2 first page: 25 year: 2019
doi: 10.15407/animbiol21.02.025
6. Dynamics of the milk microbial community during subacute ruminal acidosis with or without intramammary lipopolysaccharide challenge in dairy cows
Viktoria Neubauer, Siska Aditya, Narciso M. Quijada, Stefanie Urimare Wetzels, Monika Dzieciol, Poulad Pourazad, Qendrim Zebeli, Evelyne Selberherr
Animal Microbiome vol: 8 issue: 1 year: 2026
doi: 10.1186/s42523-025-00499-5
7. Association of Milk Somatic Cell Count with Bacteriological Cure of Intramammary Infection—A Review
Jenna Williamson, Todd Callaway, Emmanuel Rollin, Valerie Ryman
Agriculture vol: 12 issue: 9 first page: 1437 year: 2022
doi: 10.3390/agriculture12091437
8. Investigating the Pharmacokinetics and Efficacy of Intramammary Ceftiofur Hydrochloride in Prevention of Udder Inflammation in Non‐Lactating Dairy Heifers
Ranee A. Miller, Geof W. Smith, Jennifer L. Halleran, Derek M. Foster, Ronald E. Baynes
Journal of Veterinary Pharmacology and Therapeutics vol: 48 issue: 4 first page: 280 year: 2025
doi: 10.1111/jvp.13512
9. Variability of milk production traits and the mastitis prevalence in Simmental cows considering breeding region
Boris Ljubojević, Zvonimir Steiner, Nino Maćešić, Dragan Solić, Vesna Gantner
AgroReS vol: 14 first page: 150 year: 2025
doi: 10.63356/agrores.2025.020
10. Blood biochemical changes upon subclinical intramammary infection and inflammation in Holstein cattle
S. Pegolo, D. Giannuzzi, F. Piccioli-Cappelli, L. Cattaneo, M. Gianesella, P.L. Ruegg, E. Trevisi, A. Cecchinato
Journal of Dairy Science vol: 106 issue: 9 first page: 6539 year: 2023
doi: 10.3168/jds.2022-23155
11. Management factors affecting milk yield, composition, and quality on smallholder dairy farms
Marie Anne Mukasafari, Jean Pierre Mpatswenumugabo, Jean Baptiste Ndahetuye, Ewa Wredle, Renée Båge
Tropical Animal Health and Production vol: 57 issue: 2 year: 2025
doi: 10.1007/s11250-025-04294-x
12. Comparative Analysis of Methods for Somatic Cell Counting in Cow’s Milk and Relationship between Somatic Cell Count and Occurrence of Intramammary Bacteria
Vladimír Hisira, František Zigo, Marián Kadaši, Róbert Klein, Zuzana Farkašová, Mária Vargová, Pavol Mudroň
Veterinary Sciences vol: 10 issue: 7 first page: 468 year: 2023
doi: 10.3390/vetsci10070468
13.
Comprehensive Virulence Gene Profiling of Bovine Non-
aureus
Staphylococci Based on Whole-Genome Sequencing Data
Sohail Naushad, S. Ali Naqvi, Diego Nobrega, Christopher Luby, John P. Kastelic, Herman W. Barkema, Jeroen De Buck, Angela D. Kent
mSystems vol: 4 issue: 2 year: 2019
doi: 10.1128/mSystems.00098-18
14. Effects of Milk Urea Nitrogen (MUN) and Climatological Factors on Reproduction Efficiency of Holstein Friesian and Jersey Cows in the Subtropics
Edward Cottington Webb, Elandri de Bruyn
Animals vol: 11 issue: 11 first page: 3068 year: 2021
doi: 10.3390/ani11113068
15. Monitoring and Characteristics of Major Mastitis Pathogens from Bulk Tank Milk in Korea
Mun-Jo Yun, Sunghyun Yoon, Young Ju Lee
Animals vol: 10 issue: 9 first page: 1562 year: 2020
doi: 10.3390/ani10091562
16. Short communication: Characterization of an atypical maltose-negative Staphylococcus aureus through the use of phenotypic and molecular techniques
J. Karzis, I.-M. Petzer, E.F. Donkin, V. Naidoo, C. Labuschagne
Journal of Dairy Science vol: 103 issue: 8 first page: 7407 year: 2020
doi: 10.3168/jds.2019-17901
17. The Relationship between S. aureus and Branched-Chain Amino Acids Content in Composite Cow Milk
L. Grispoldi, M. Karama, F. Ianni, A. La Mantia, L. Pucciarini, E. Camaioni, R. Sardella, P. Sechi, B. Natalini, B. T. Cenci-Goga
Animals vol: 9 issue: 11 first page: 981 year: 2019
doi: 10.3390/ani9110981
18. Investigation of the relationship between bacterial groups isolated from buffalo milk with subclinical mastitis and somatic cell counts
Funda EŞKİ, Serdal KURT, Ayhan BAŞTAN
Etlik Veteriner Mikrobiyoloji Dergisi vol: 33 issue: 2 first page: 30 year: 2022
doi: 10.35864/evmd.1152537
19. Bovine mastitis-associated bacterial pathogens: a systematic review based on some African dairy systems
Lungile Gumede, Mpho Ramuada, Thobela Louis Tyasi, Teedzai Chitura
Frontiers in Animal Science vol: 7 year: 2026
doi: 10.3389/fanim.2026.1744414
